Local · B1G Country — O-H! (Charts)

East North Central

Footprint tier champions: National: Verizon · Mid-market: UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION · Regional: ACD.net · State: Metro Wireless · Local: Xiber LLC

Nine U.S. divisions — click a state to open that division’s bracket for this tier (map scales with the page).

Local playoff bracket

Qualifiers (Local tier · 26)

#	Provider	Locations	Reviews	Avg	Footprint	+ / −	Bracket
1	Xiber LLC	2	1.8k	4.58	72.3	—	72.3
2	Skyweb Networks Inc	1	2.7k	4.90	71.2	—	71.2
3	Conxxus	1	2.5k	4.90	70.9	—	70.9
4	Zentro	1	3.1k	4.80	70.8	—	70.8
5	RTC Communications	2	373	4.92	70.3	—	70.3
6	RTC Communications Corp.	2	455	4.78	69.8	—	69.8
7	Blueriver Networking Services	2	331	4.84	69.3	—	69.3
8	Pavlov Media	2	1.9k	4.01	68.0	—	68.0
9	e-vergent	2	304	4.68	67.8	—	67.8
10	JCWIFI.com	1	995	4.80	67.4	—	67.4
11	NKTELCO - Goldstar	2	331	4.58	67.2	—	67.2
12	NKTelco	2	331	4.58	67.2	—	67.2
13	Peerless Network	2	113	4.90	66.6	—	66.6
14	Smart Way Communications	1	544	4.80	65.6	—	65.6
15	Shawnee Communications	2	177	4.61	65.6	—	65.6
16	Shawnee Telephone Company	2	177	4.61	65.6	—	65.6
17	123.NET Inc	2	196	4.40	64.2	—	64.2
18	Haywire	1	239	4.90	64.0	—	64.0
19	NITCO	2	364	4.11	63.8	—	63.8
20	Smithville Communications	1	609	4.50	63.6	—	63.6
21	Smithville Telecom	1	609	4.50	63.6	—	63.6
22	Bloomingdale Communications, Inc.	2	149	4.38	63.3	—	63.3
23	JB-Nets LLC	2	57	4.74	63.3	—	63.3
24	BROADLINC	1	405	4.60	63.1	—	63.1
25	Mid Century Telephone Cooperative, Inc.	1	237	4.80	63.1	—	63.1
26	Cambridge Telephone Company	2	225	4.19	63.0	—	63.0

Profile snapshot

Xiber LLC is highlighted (Local tier champion for this division). Footprint score comes from aggregated Google profile rows; bracket score adds Serper review sentiment (positive vs negative counts from the reviews API).

Want a deeper dive?

Leave your email and we'll follow up. Optionally add a short note about what you'd like to explore.

Methodology

Aggregate Google profile rows by provider and census division (state → region mapping).
Top 26 per region by footprint composite; each provider is placed in a single global footprint tier (Local, State, Regional, Mid-market, or National) from US-wide listing, state, and division counts. Serper POST /reviews by place_id (cached) at build time.
Seeds and qualifiers are ordered by Supabase footprint (composite). Matchup winners compare a Serper-only duel score from positive vs negative review counts in the payload (≥4 vs ≤2); if Serper is off or missing, both sides fall back to footprint composite for that game. Ties break by footprint, then seed.

National pool seeding rules are summarized on the National assessments hub.

How footprint tiers are defined

National
At least two census divisions and more than 30 distinct mappable US states.
- Listings = distinct Google place_id across the country plus rows without a place_id (each row counts).
- States and divisions are derived only from rows with a mappable US state → census division.
Mid-market
At least two census divisions and not National, with either three or more states or exactly two states (multi-division gap rule).
- Closes the gap where a provider spans multiple divisions with only two states—they still land here instead of being unclassified.
Regional
All activity in a single census division and at least two mappable states.
State
More than two listings and footprint in exactly one mappable state.
Local
At most two listings (US-wide).

If there are no mappable states but more than two listings, we still assign a tier: Mid-market when there are multiple census divisions, Regional when there is exactly one division, otherwise State. Any remaining edge case is classified as Mid-market.